Abhidhamma in Daily life
Chapter 18
ELEMENTS
The
Buddha spoke about realities as elements in order to remind us that they
are impermanent and not self. When we speak about elements we usually think
of the elements in chemistry or physics which have each their own characteristics.
In chemistry and physics matter is analysed into elements, but it may seem
strange to us to regard the eye or seeing as elements. We are not used
to consider them as elements because we are inclined to take them for 'self'.
What we take for self are only nama-elements
and rupa-elements which arise because of their appropriate conditions and
then fall away again. Eyesense is only an element which has its own characteristic
and is devoid of self ; it is rupa which arises because of conditions and
then falls away again. Seeing is only an element which has its own characteristic
and is devoid of self ; it is nama which arises because of conditions and
falls away again.
ln the Buddha's teachings realities
are classified as elements, some of which are rupa and some of which are
nama. When they are classified as eighteen elements; they are as follows:
The five
senses:
1. eye-element (cakkhu-dhatu)
2. ear-element (sota-dhatu)
3. nose-element (ghana-dhatu)
4. tongue-element (jivha-dhatu)
5. body-element (kaya-dhatu) which is the body-sense
The five
objects (experienced through the five senses):
6. visible object-element (rupa-dhatu)
7. sound-element (sadda-dhatu)
8. smell-element (gandha-dhatu)
9. taste-element (rasa-dhatu)
10. element of tangible objects (photthabba-dhatu),
comprising the following three kinds of rupa:
earth-element (solidity), appearing as hardness or softness
fire-element (temperature), appearing as heat or cold
wind-element, appearing as motion or pressure
The dvi-panca-vinnanas
(experiencing the five sense objects):
11. seeing-consciousness-element (cakkhu-vinnana-dhatu)
12. hearing-consciousness-element (sota-vinnan-adhatu)
13. smelling-consciousness-element (ghana-vinnana-dhatu)
14. tasting-consciousness-element (jivha-vinnana-dhatu)
15. body-consciousness-element (kaya-vinnana-dhatu)
Three more
elements:
16. mano-dhatu or mind-element
17. dhamma-dhatu
18. mano-vinnana-dhatu or mind-consciousness-element
The five elements which are the
five sense-doors are rupa and the five elements which are the objects experienced
through the sense-doors are rupa as well. The five elements which are the
dvi-panca-vinnanas, experiencing these objects, are
nama. There are two cittas which
are cakkhu-vinnana-dhatu, since seeing-consciousness can be kusala vipaka
or akusala vipaka. It is the same with the other panca-vinnanas. Thus there
are 'five pairs' of citta which are panca-vinnana-dhatu.
The element which is mano-dhatu or
mind-element is nama. Mano-dhatu comprises the panca-dvaravajjana-citta
(five-sense-door-adverting-consciousness) and the two types of sampaticchana-citta
(receiving-consciousness) which are kusala vipaka and akusala vipaka. Thus
three kinds of citta are mano-dhatu.
Dhamma-dhatu comprises both nama
and rupa. Dhamma-dhatu is the cetasikas, the subtle rupas (sukhuma-rupas)
and nibbana.
Mano-vinnana-dhatu or mind-consciousness-element
is nama. It comprises all cittas which are not the dvi-panca-vinnanas and
not mano-dhatu. For example,
santirana-citta (investigating-consciousness),
mano-dvaravajjana-citta (mind-door-adverting-consciousness) and the cittas
performing the function of javana such as lobha-mula-citta are mano-vinnana-dhatu.
Panca-vinnana-dhatu (seeing-consciousness-element,
etc.), the mano-dhatu (mind-element) and the mano-vinnana-dhatu (mind-consciousness-element)
are: vinnana-dhatu (consciousness-element).
Dhamma-dhatu is not identical with
dhammarammana (mind-objects). Cittas are included in dhammarammana, but
not in dhamma-dhatu, since dhamma-dhatu is: cetasikas, subtle rupas and
nibbana. When cittas are classified as elements they are the seven classes
of vinnana-dhatu, namely:
Panca-vinnana-dhatu (which are five
classes), mano-dhatu (mind-element), mano-vinnana-dhatu (mind-consciousness-element).
Concepts and conventional terms (pannatti)
which are included in dhammarammana are not dhamma-dhatu, because they
are not paramattha dhammas. Only paramattha dhammas are classified as elements.
Sometimes the Buddha spoke about
six elements ; or he classified realities as two elements. There are many
different ways of classifying realities, but no matter in which way realities
are classified, as khandha, by way of arammana (objects), or in any other
way, we should remember the purpose of classifying realities : realizing
that what we take for self are only nama-elements and rupa-elements.
In the 'Satipatthana-sutta' (Discourse
on the Applications of Mindfulness, Middle Length Sayings I, No.10) we
read in the section about mindfulness of the body, that the Buddha spoke
about the body in terms of elements. The text states:
And again, monks, a monk
reflects on this body
according to how it is placed or
disposed in respect
of the elements, thinking: 'In this
body there is the
element of extension (solidity),
the element of cohesion, the
element of heat, the element of
motion.' Monks, even
as a skilled cattle-butcher, or
his apprentice, having
slaughtered a cow, might sit displaying
its carcass at a
cross-roads, even so, monks, does
a monk reflect on this
body itself according to how it
is placed or disposed in
respect of the elements, thinking:
'In this body there is
the element of extension, the element
of cohesion, the
element of heat, the element of
motion'. Thus he
fares along contemplating the body
in the body
internally...and he fares along
independently of and
not grasping anything in the world.
It is thus too, monks,
that a monk fares along contemplating
the body in
the body...
The 'Visuddhimagga' (XI, 30) states:
What is meant? Just as a butcher,
while feeding the
cow, bringing it to the shambles,
keeping it tied up
after bringing it there, slaughtering
it, and seeing it
slaughtered and dead, does not lose
the perception
'cow' so long as he has not carved
it up and divided
it into parts ; but when he has
divided it up and is sitting
there, he loses the perception 'cow'
and the perception
'meat' occurs ; he does not think
'I am selling cow'
or 'They are carrying cow away',
but rather he thinks
'I am selling meat' or 'They are
carrying meat away';
so too this bhikkhu, while still
a foolish ordinary
person--both formerly as a layman
and as one gone
forth into homelessness--, does
not lose the perception
'living being' or 'man' or 'person'
so long as he does
not, by resolution of the compact
into elements, review
this body, however placed, however
disposed, as
consisting of elements. But when
he does review it
as consisting of elements, he loses
the perception 'living
being' and his mind establishes
itself upon elements....
It may not be appealing to see
the body as elements. We think of people as 'this man' or 'that woman'.
We are not used to analysing what we take for a 'person' in the way we
analyse matter, as we do, for example in physics. One might find it crude
to think of a body carved up as a cow is carved up by a butcher. However,
if we consider the body as it is, there are only elements. Isn't it true
that there are solidity, cohesion, temperature and motion? Are these realities
'self', or are they elements devoid of 'self'?
Do the four elements of solidity,
cohesion, temperature and motion have anything to do with our daily life?
These elements arise all the time. Temperature can appear either as heat
or cold; do we not feel heat or cold very often? When we are stung by an
insect we can experience the characteristic of heat. We can feel impact
of hardness or softness on our body when we are lying down, sitting, walking
or standing. Is that not daily life? If we are mindful of the characteristics
of the elements more often, we will see things as they are.
The Buddha reminded people of the
truth in many different ways. Sometimes he spoke about the body as a corpse
in different stages of dissolution. Or he spoke about the 'parts of the
body' and he explained how the body is full of impurities,
in order to remind people that what
we take for our body are only elements which are devoid of beauty, which
are dukkha, impermanent and not self.
We read in the 'Satipatthana-sutta',
in the section about mindfulness of the body:
Monks, it is like a double-mouthed
provision bag
that is full of various kinds of
grain such as hill-paddy,
paddy, kidneybeans, peas, sesame,
rice; and a
keen-eyed man, pouring them out,
were to reflect:
'That's hill-paddy, that's paddy,
that's kidneybeans,
that's peas, that's sesame, that's
rice.' Even so monks,
does a monk reflect on precisely
this body itself, encased
in skin and full of various impurities,
from the soles
of the feet up and from the crown
of the head down...
Not only the body, but also the mind
should be considered as elements. There is nothing in our life which is
not an element. Our past lives were only elements and our future lives
will only be elements. We are inclined to think of our future life and
wish for a happy rebirth. We should, however, realize that there is no
self which in the future will have another existence ; there are and will
be only elements. We have learned to classify citta in different ways and
this reminds us that cittas are only elements. Not only cittas are elements,
but cetasikas too are elements. We are attached to happy feeling and we
dislike unpleasant feeling. Feelings, however, are only elements, which
arise because of conditions. When we are tired or sick we take tiredness
and sickness for self and we have aversion. Why do we not accept unpleasant
things as they come to us, since they are only elements? One might not
be inclined to see realities as elements, but it is the truth. One might
not like to remember that things are impermanent, that birth is followed
by ageing, sickness and death, but it is the truth. Why do we not want
to see the truth?
In the 'Discourse on the Manyfold
Elements' (Middle Length Sayings III, 115) we read that the Buddha, while
he was staying in the Jeta Grove, in Anathapindika's monastery, said to
the monks that fears, troubles and misfortunes occur to the fool, not to
the wise man. He said to the monks:
'...Monks, there is not
fear, trouble, misfortune
for the wise man. Wherefore, monks,
thinking,
'Investigating, we will become wise',
this is how you
must train yourselves, monks.'
When this had been said, the venerable
Ananda
spoke thus to the Lord: 'What is
the stage at which
it suffices to say, revered sir:
'Investigating, the monk
is wise'?'
'Ananda, as soon as a monk is skilled
in the elements
and skilled in the (sense) fields
and skilled in
conditioned genesis and skilled
in the possible and the
impossible, it is at this stage,
Ananda, that it suffices
to say, 'Investigating, the monk
is wise.''
'But, revered sir, at what stage
does it suffice to
say, 'The monk is skilled in the
elements'?'
'There are these eighteen elements,
Ananda: the
element of eye, the element of material
shape, the
element of visual consciousness;
the element of ear,
the element of sound, the element
of auditory
consciousness ; the element of nose,
the element of
smell, the element of olfactory
consciousness ; the
element of tongue, the element of
taste, the element
of gustatory consciousness; the
element of body, the
element of touch, the element of
bodily consciousness;
the element of mind, the element
of mind-objects, the
element of mental consciousness.
When, Ananda, he
knows and sees these eighteen elements,
it is at this
stage that it suffices to say, 'The
monk is skilled in
the elements.' '
'Might there be another way also,
revered sir,
according to which suffices to say,
'The monk is skilled
in the elements'?'
'There might be, Ananda. There are
these six
elements, Ananda: the element of
extension, the
element of cohesion, the element
of radiation, the
element of mobility, the element
of space, the element
of consciousness. When, Ananda,
he knows and sees
these six elements, it is at this
stage that it suffices
to say, 'The monk is skilled in
the elements.''
'Might there be another way also,
revered sir,
according to which it suffices to
say, 'The monk is
skilled in the elements'?'
'There might be, Ananda. There are
these six
elements, Ananda: the element of
happiness, the
element of anguish, the element
of gladness, the element
of sorrowing, the element of equanimity,
the element
of ignorance. When, Ananda, he knows
and sees these
six elements, it is at this stage
that it suffices to say,
'The monk is skilled in the elements.''
The Buddha then explained still
other ways of being skilled in the elements and further on we read that
Ananda asked again :
'Might there be another
way also, revered sir,
according to which it suffices to
say, 'The monk is
skilled in the elements'?'
'There might be, Ananda. There are
these two
elements, Ananda: the element that
is constructed and
the element that is unconstructed.
When, Ananda, he
knows and sees these two elements,
it is at this stage
that it suffices to say, 'The monk
is skilled in the element.
The element which is constructed is
all conditioned realities (the five khandhas), and the element which is
unconstructed is nibbana. Also nibbana is an element, it is devoid of self.
Nibbana is not a person, it is anatta. We read in this sutta about the
monk who knows and sees the elements. Knowing and seeing the elements does
not mean only knowing them in theory and thinking about them. One knows
and sees the elements when panna realizes nama and rupa as they are: only
elements, not self. This knowledge will lead to the end of 'fears, troubles
and misfortunes'.
Questions
1. When realities are classified
as eighteen elements, what element
is cetasika?
2. Which paramattha dhammas
are vinnana-dhatu
(consciousness-element)?
3. Is mano-vinnana-dhatu (mind-consciousness-element)
included
in vinnana-dhatu?
4. Through how many doors
does mano-dhatu experience an object?
5. Why is also nibbana an
element?
|