Kamma of praise and blame, and the kamma of prais and blame

Author
Topic
#402

Quote
Maimed

Bhikkhus, possessing four qualities, the foolish, incompetent, bad person maintains himself in a maimed and injured condition; he is blameworthy and subject to reproach by the wise; and he generates much demerit. What four?
(1) “Without investigating and scrutinizing, he speaks praise of one who deserves dispraise.
(2) Without investigating and scrutinizing, he speaks dispraise of one who deserves praise.
(3) Without investigating and scrutinizing, he believes a matter that merits suspicion.
(4) Without investigating and scrutinizing, he is suspicious about a matter that merits belief.

Possessing these four qualities, the foolish, incompetent bad person maintains himself in a maimed and injured condition; he is blameworthy and subject to reproach by the wise; and he generates much demerit.
“Bhikkhus, possessing four qualities, the wise, competent, good person preserves himself unmaimed and uninjured; he is blameless and beyond reproach by the wise; and he generates much merit. What four?
(1) “Having investigated and scrutinized, he speaks dispraise of one who deserves dispraise.
(2) Having investigated and scrutinized, he speaks praise of one who deserves praise.
(3) Having investigated and scrutinized, he is suspicious about a matter that merits suspicion.
(4) Having investigated and scrutinized, he believes a matter that merits belief.

Possessing these four qualities, the wise, competent, good person preserves himself unmaimed and uninjured; he is blameless and beyond reproach by the wise; and he generates much merit.”

He who praises one deserving blame,
or blames one deserving praise,
casts with his mouth an unlucky throw
by which he finds no happiness.

Slight is the unlucky throw at dice
that results in the loss of one’s wealth,
[the loss] of all, oneself included;
much worse is this unlucky throw
of harboring hate against the fortunate ones.

For a hundred thousand and thirty-six
nirabbudas, plus five abbudas,
the slanderer of noble ones goes to hell,
having defamed them with evil speech and mind.

Yet, a smart would think (not willing to investigate further): “What if I let go of praise (appropriation) and blame (showing disprove)”.

That would be good, but actually bad if your are still involved.

It would be good and a sign if you turn around and walk your ways, but it would be bad if you participate.

It is not possible to be non-attached, while still taking part. Complicity has impact for generations and not all are able to read thought, actually very less.

Responsibility will always be your duty as long as you participate, nourish for the benefits of involvement.

To imitate the non-attached in the middle of faults is praising and teaching householder equanimity. Softwood for hardwood for a long long time.

And then the thought arises: Should I stay or should I go

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.